ISIS/ISIL/IS: Do Western Politicians Understand?

I think the article below reveals a different picture of the current Iraq/Syria situation than the one being portrayed by our politicians. The standard political stance is that members of ISIS/ISIL/IS are extremists and not representative of Islam. And yet, it’s not only young angry Moslem men who are seeking to join the “cause” – according to the article below there are families and women with children who see this regime as a more valid representation of Islam, where they can raise their families away from the perceived spiritual corruption of their original homelands (even Muslim majority homelands).


This morning I heard a TV interview with the Victorian State Premier, mainly about yesterday’s knife attack on two policemen (which resulted in the attacker being shot dead). The Premier said people needed to see themselves as Victorians and Australians first – implying that any “religious” affiliation should be secondary to State and Nationalist identity. In that remark he not only displayed his own ignorance of the importance of relationship with God; he fails to recognise how strongly others (whatever their religion) consider their faith is of PRIMARY importance in their life – that any State or National allegiance is far less important than their allegiance to their God.


As long as politicians underestimate the religious commitment of others – and see that loyal citizenship within this world ISN’T the defining factor for many people, they will continue to ignore how religious faith is a stronger motivation for those people than any supposed loyalty to secular community.


Are ISIS/ISIL/IS extremists or are they following real Islam more closely than the wider Moslem community? Or is real Islam better reflected by the moderate followers of the religion – those that Western politicians claim (or hope?) are the true representation of a religion they (try to) assure us is peaceful?


Maybe a hinted answer to those questions can be found in the response from “western” Moslem communities. There have been a few moderate voices condemning what is going on in Iraq and Syria; voices that point out that the majority of victims of ISIS/ISIL/IS are in fact Moslems, but there are others who are more interested in condemning the claimed victimising of Moslems whenever action is taken to avert known threats from groups or individuals such as the recent plan to publically behead a random victim in central Sydney.


In reality Islam has various forms, covering varying degrees of commitment and expression, often determined by the type of society in which it is expressed.  Moderates are more likely to be found in Western nations where Islam isn’t the dominant religion, but its been made clear that not all Moslems in the west are “moderate”.

In the wider world today it seems there’s an increasing move to a stricter, less tolerant expression, perhaps more in keeping with the roots of the religion.


As for my personal view , I suggest we get the most accurate picture of Islam by looking to those countries where Islam dominates and Sharia Law is practiced. How tolerant are those nations and how moderate is their treatment of people holding different beliefs? It is in areas under Moslem rule that Christians face the most persecution and suffering.



Turks leave for ‘family-friendly’ IS group


The Islamic State group is run by religious zealots and marked by war, mass killings, crucifixions and beheadings.


But for a growing number of fundamentalist Muslim families, the group’s territory is home.


“Who says children here are unhappy?” said Asiya Ummi Abdullah, a 24-year-old Muslim convert who travelled to the group’s realm with her infant son last month.


She said that living under Shariah, the Islamic legal code, means the boy’s spiritual life is secure.


“He will know God and live under his rules,” she said.


Ummi Adullah’s story, told to The Associated Press in a series of messages exchanged via Facebook, illustrates how, despite the extreme violence which the radical group broadcasts to the world, the territory it controls has turned into a magnet for devout families, many of them Turkish, who have made their way there with children in tow.


Ummi Abduallah said her move to the militant group’s realm was in part to shield her three-year-old from the sex, crime, drugs and alcohol that she sees as rampant in largely secular Turkey.


Full article here:

You can make the Bible say almost anything.

The title of this post “you can make the Bible say almost anything” is a claim I’ve heard several times, most recently in reply to a comment I made on another blog.

In the past I may have said something similar myself, but now I strongly disagree with that statement.

In reality the Bible CAN’T be made to “say almost anything”, but  if we put our trust in commentaries, study bibles with interpretive notes, or church teachers (without addressing scripture for ourselves) we can be made to believe that the Bible says things that it DOESN’T say.

A more accurate claim would be to say that PARTS of  the Bible can be used to support a variety of contradictory ideas. If those parts are used with no consideration of context, if they are used as isolated statements that have no relationship with the rest of scripture, those bible “texts” can be the false teachers most valuable tool.

What Does “Missional” Even Mean? (recommended article from Jeff Weddle)


What Does “Missional” Even Mean? Or, One Reason Why I Dropped Out of Seminary


I’ve been reading a book by an academic theologian lately. Came across this sentence:

Missional presence and activity is nothing more than participation in the missio Dei and that participation is the praxis of atonement.”

First, let me just say, after one reading, I hope you have no idea what that means.

Second, if you do know what that means after one reading, I encourage you to get out with people more often.

Third, although theology is just a bunch of guys trying to talk smart about God, it’s not a bad thing to know how to dissect their statements.

It’s a good exercise to read complicated theology every once in a while. Not too often, but once in a while. It does stretch the brain. Sometimes it stretches boundaries of word definitions as well.

If theologians made theology easy, they’d be out of a job. Theologians spend a lot of time alone with big books. Their only hope of being of use is to turn others into isolationist book readers who talk above others.

There is no office of “theologian” detailed in the Bible for the Church. Ephesians 4, which tells us all the gifted people we need to be mature in Christ, never mentions a theologian. Yes, there are teachers, but the job of a teacher is to make complex things simple, not to make complex things indiscernible

Read complete article here:

Good Reputation?

Today I came across the article at the following link, in which a Sydney mosque claims to have had it’s “good reputation” tarnished – merely because it auctioned a flag associated with the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group.


Note the statement from the mosque:

“We reject any attempts to tarnish the good reputation of our centre and pledge to stand firm against the current wave of Islamophobia. We also believe that scapegoating and fear mongering has the serious potential of radicalising disaffected youth.”.

Maybe if these people were more eager to stand against the so-called “extremists” and their demonic actions there would be less “Islamophobia”.

And it is interesting that the “radicalising of disaffected youth” that leads to the involvement in terrorist activities is being blamed on the rest of society and not on the kind of mosques that would seek to capitalise on the sale of a flag identified with the atrocities currently being committed in Iraq and Syria

Hamas. Intimidation. Executions.

It seems that Hamas has been observing the most recent ceasefire and things have become quieter, but it’s only a week or so ago that 18 people were executed by Hamas for allegedly collaborating with the “enemy” (some reports give a number of 22 victims). What were the collaborators guilty of?

Maybe the following news report gives an indication.

Trapped in Gaza: How Hamas punishes reporters for the truth



HAMAS is not just targeting Israeli civilians, threatening Gazans and using them as humans shields.
It has another terror tactic: intimidating foreign journalists.
Journalists who have taken pictures of Hamas operatives preparing to shoot rockets from civilian structures and/or fighting in civilian clothing have been threatened by Hamas operatives and had their equipment confiscated.

Reporter Peter Stefanovic, of the Nine Network’s news, stationed in Gaza, received a surge of abuse and threats when he tweeted that he had seen rockets fired into Israel from near his hotel, in a civilian area.

Pro-Hamas tweeters said Stefanovic was “passing and fabricating information to Israel … from GAZA”. Another account wrote: “You are a cretin. Are you working for the IDF” and “in WWII spies got shot”.

full story here:

Also see more reports including videos at the following link. One of the videos can be seen below the link: