16
Apr
13

Israel Replaced?


Andrew Strom’s blog has an interesting discussion that was intended to look at the validity or otherwise of replacement theology. Reading the article and the comments that follow it, I see a lot of confused and contradictory ideas being expressed. The issue is certainly one driven by ignorance, but considering scripture isn’t confused and contradictory, the ignorance must have a different source.

To me scripture couldn’t be clearer when it comes to the relationship between God and Israel. It is only through leaning on men’s traditions instead of searching the scriptures that this issue has become a point of often heated disagreement. Like so many other contentious issues, the solution is found in accepting what scripture ACTUALLY says instead of reinterpreting parts of it to fit a predetermined theological stance.

http://www.revivalschool.com/replacement-israel-the-church-andrew-strom/

I note that in one sense Strom is opposed to “replacement theology” but overall his view seems confused, typified by statements like this: “it is the CHURCH that is the `apple of God´s eye´ in the New Covenant era – not Israel.” Reading the biblical reference to the “apple of God’s eye” in context surely shows the statement refers to Israel and only Israel. (see Deuteronomy 32:9-11 and Zechariah 2)

 

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Israel Replaced?”


  1. April 16, 2013 at 1:03 pm

    I agree. I read the same discussion and was also surprised at the confusion and diversity of opinion. There seems to be a lot of confusion in the church on this issue but the scriptures are not difficult to understand.

  2. April 16, 2013 at 1:14 pm

    Confusion arises when people put other concerns (such as political and theological bias) ahead of scripture.


Comments are currently closed.

Blog Stats

  • 67,980 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 226 other followers


%d bloggers like this: