17
Oct
12

Derren Brown Investigates: or does he?


 I saw an episode of Derren Brown Investigates on TV the other night, related to the “ghosthunter” Lou Gentile and his investigations into ghostly phenomena. Brown presented evidence for the reality of ghosts and demons as given to him by Gentile; and then he gave his own views of that evidence.

One specific aspect of his program that I found interesting was Brown’s reaction to video of a man undergoing “exorcism”. The man’s body was thrown into violent contortions until he was almost “levitating” above the bed (or couch) on which he was lying. Brown apparently found this disturbing at the time but his mind was eased when he found a scientist who could give a “medical” explanation.

He was shown a similar film of a woman demonstrating the same behaviour and the expert described it as a “pseudo seizure” or “psychogenic non-epileptic seizure”. These are “seizures” that are allegedly psychological in origin – in other words it seems like there is no physical/chemical evidence for the cause of the seizures, so they are attributed to being caused by aberrations in the mental state.

Sorry – but to me this merely seems like a preferred alternative diagnosis acceptable to those who disbelieve the existence of a spirit world. There is effectively little difference to the two diagnoses – apart from the belief system of the ones making the diagnosis. One sees demons – the other sees psychological disorder. The “truth” is in the mind of the beholder.

This assumption laden approach is little different to the attitude displayed by the “ghosthunter” when he presented his evidence for the existence of ghosts. Both project their prefered worldview onto what they experience to give conclusions they feel comfortable accepting.

Gentile’s evidence (both audio and photographic) seemed entirely subjective – spoken words were “heard” within the static and noise recorded on a voice activated recorder, but to me, even with a lot of imagination the claimed messages were very unlikely The same with the photos showing mists – almost anything could be projected into a photo. The “best” evidence was a photo in which (when pointed out) a very clear face could be seen in the mist. That was interesting but definitely not the conclusive evidence it was claimed to be by Lou Gentile.

The BEST conclusion that could genuinely be drawn from this show is that people will believe what they choose to believe. They will be convinced by the flimsiest of evidence when it supports what they want to see, and they will not be swayed by strong evidence when they don’t want to believe.

Rather than being a genuine investigation into the reality or otherwise of ghosts – the programme was a revelation of the power of a person’s desire to believe (or not). In this case it was Brown’s show so his conclusions were presented as being the most reasonable. But were they?

Or was the foundation of those conclusions no less shaky than the foundation of the ghosthunter’s conclusions? It depends upon who or what you want to believe most.

______ 

Possession or pseudo seizure? The video.

Move forward to around around the 5 minute mark.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5A2PF8X5WU&feature=share&list=PL658657896F57FB46

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Derren Brown Investigates: or does he?”


  1. 1 Shez-Anais Chelios
    May 22, 2013 at 11:38 pm

    Don’t think it is fair to have a go at Derren Brown. People will choose to believe what they want to believe. Sadly Mr Gentile died not long after this film was made. This series is actually a few years old now also. Personally I do not believe in such things as being possessed and for myself a medical condition seems a lot more feasible. Others would disgree.

  2. May 23, 2013 at 8:12 am

    Yes people choose to believe what they want to believe – Derren Brown is no exception. The problem with matters like “demon possession” or anything that challenges a materialist world view is that no one on either sides of the fence is willing to consider evidence contrary to their own viewpoint. We see this from both the doubters and the believers.

    Another problem is the claim that something is an “investigation” when it is merely a process conducted to confirm or promote a preconceived belief.


Comments are currently closed.

Blog Stats

  • 77,253 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 236 other followers


%d bloggers like this: